BY LEONARD PITTS JR.

Palm Beach Post     April 7, 2021America is on trial.

Or at least, that is the conviction of many observers as Derek Chauvin, a white former Minneapolis police officer, faces judge and jury in the death of George Floyd, a 46-year-old African-American man. America on trial: it’s a headline in Time, the Toronto Star and Agence Marocaine De Presse, a news agency in Morocco. It’s the considered opinion of CNN’s Don Lemon, the Rev. Al Sharpton and of a group of black barbers in Washington, D.C., who were interviewed by NPR.

It is also the view of Philonise Floyd. “America is on trial,” says Philonise, brother of George, who died last year lying handcuffed in the street for nine and a half excruciating minutes, unresisting and crying out for his mother as Chauvin pressed a knee into his neck. “If you can’t get justice for this as a Black man in America, what can you get justice for?”

It is not difficult to understand why many of us believe that what happens in that courtroom will render a verdict not just on Chauvin, but on the nation, on our self-appraised land of truths held self evident, equality under the law, liberty and justice for all. Is any of that real? Does any of it mean anything? Many of us are looking to that Minneapolis courtroom for answers.

America is on trial, they say. Well, maybe it is. But here is a contrarian view: This trial cannot vindicate America.

Let’s assume for a moment Chauvin is acquitted. What message does that send? The answer is obvious. It sends the same message that has been sent for four centuries: that for African Americans, justice remains elusive, nearly impossible, especially in cases of police wrongdoing.

Maybe you think the message changes if Chauvin is convicted. But does it, really?

Consider what that conviction will have required. The killing took place in broad daylight, seen by a crowd of onlookers whose cellphone video turned us all into eyewitnesses. We all heard Floyd’s moaning pleas; all saw the chilling nonchalance in Chauvin’s face. Cities around the world convulsed in outrage.

If it takes that excess of evidence and that level of public pressure for Chauvin to be convicted, would that really attest to the integrity of American justice toward African-American people? Or would it not ultimately say pretty much the same thing an acquittal would: that for us, justice is harder, the bar higher, the road steeper, especially where allegations against the police are concerned.

Unequal justice is not justice at all. Yet that’s precisely what we have so often seen, unarmed Black women, children and men killed, and cops, time after time, excused.

Don’t misunderstand. The view from this corner is that Chauvin very much deserves conviction and incarceration. The hope is that he receives both. But let’s not fool ourselves into thinking that would say something about American justice that it simply would not.

All it would say is that in a crime committed before the entire world and with the entire world watching, America — or at least, a jury of 12 Americans — could not bring itself to deny a self-evident truth. That’s no inspiring affirmation of national values. Rather, it’s the bare minimum common humanity demands. And again: It’s entirely possible the court will do even less than the minimum and acquit Chauvin, an outcome that experience tells us is hardly inconceivable.

So no, America is not on trial here. Derek Chauvin is, and we await the verdict. But as to America?

That verdict is already in.

*     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *     *      *      *      *      *     *     *     *

Leonard Pitts is a very well-known writer and syndicated columnist.  I see his columns in my local paper, the Palm Beach Post.  I read this article this morning, April 11, four days after it first appeared.  Mr. Pitts is clearly a man of the left and I read him, among others, to try to understand the points of view of others like him.

He points out that, if Derek Chauvin is acquitted, that is further evidence that America is racist since it is obvious Chauvin is clearly guilty.  His mind is obviously closed to any other possibility, regardless of the fact that the defense has not begun.  For him, guilt is self evident; all you need to do is look at the tape.  No presumption of innocence appropriate here. The consequence of an acquittal will be rioting all over the country as promised by BLM leaders.

However, if Chauvin is found guilty, that is not evidence that America is not racist.  His reasoning is that the evidence is so overwhelming, that a guilty verdict is required by even a racist nation.

Mr. Pitts evidence of racism is rooted in a lie. He writes  “….    unarmed Black women, children and men killed, and cops, time after time, excused.” That statement  is the big lie. Last year about 10 unarmed (not necessarily unthreatening) blacks and about 20 whites were killed by police across the U.S.  Every one of those blacks killed have been publicized thoroughly, reported in the press endlessly, and where appropriate, the police involved charged. None of them were innocent people simply going about their business. All were involved in some criminal activity of some sort, all refused to follow the orders of police.  This is not evidence of racism.

In the Floyd case involving policeman Derek Chauvin, they were dealing with a criminal, who apparently was high on illegal drugs, who would not follow instructions and consistently fought police.  Whether Chauvin used excessive force and complicit in his death is a job for the jury  to decide after hearing all the evidence. If they acquit, it will not be because America is racist, or because this jury is racist, it will be because there was not sufficient evidence beyond a reasonable doubt.

All comments are welcome.